Carbon dating controversy wiki dating chien

12 Jan

It may be found in the 14th paragraph of the following reference.

Much progress in the field of geology has been made since 1917, 100 years ago.

Every object on this list has been accused of being an elaborate hoax.

In many cases, a conspiracy is the only explanation, without an extensive rewriting of the world’s history books.

According to Fanti, both the infrared light beam and the red laser of the Raman spectroscope excite the molecules of the material, and the resulting reflections make it possible “to evaluate the concentration of particular substances contained in the cellulose of the linen fibers.” Because cellulose degrades over time, he said, “it is therefore possible to determine a correlation with the age of the fabric.” Fanti compared his results with nine other ancient textiles of known provenance, with ages from 3000 B. The shroud’s official custodian, Archbishop Cesare Nosiglia of Turin, told “There is no degree of safety on the authenticity of the materials on which these experiments were carried out [on] the shroud cloth.” Responded Fanti, “He did not read my book, and especially its appendix in which the traceability of the samples is clearly shown.” According to Fanti, Riggi unstitched the backing cloth that was sewn onto the shroud in 1532 to protect it after it was damaged in a fire and vacuumed some of the dust that had accumulated between the two sheets, catching this residue on a series of filters.

It was on fibers from “filter H” that Fanti did most of his work.

In response to email questions, Fanti explained that he used a pair of established techniques, infrared light (Fourier Transform Infrared, or FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy, to measure the amount of cellulose in shroud fibers given to him by microanalyst Giovanni Riggi di Numana, a participant in the 1978 Shroud of Turin Research Project (STURP), as well as the controversial 1988 carbon-dating tests of the shroud.

C., give or take 250 years, thus nicely bracketing the year 30, when most historians say Jesus died on the cross.

Triceratops Horn Dated to 33,500 Years- By April Holloway A Triceratops brow horn discovered in Dawson County, Montana, has been controversially dated to around 33,500 years, challenging the view that dinosaurs died out around 65 million years ago.

The finding radically suggests that early humans may have once walked the earth with the fearsome reptiles thousands of years ago.

Many of these objects have been labeled out of place artifacts or anachronisms.

These archeological discoveries are always controversial and the scientific community is extremely selective in what they accept as fact.